Njoy704
06-10-15, 00:25
"No evidence of venous insufficiency, acute DVT or deep
venous obstruction was observed.
This negative result does not exclude isolated calf vein thrombus or non-obstructive proximal vein thrombus"
The last part is confusing. Why does it say it doesn't exclude calf vein thrombus or non-obstructive obstructive proximal vein thrombus? I thought the ultrasound was to exclude clots/thrombus throughout the whole leg. My whole leg was scanned.
Anyone else get a report like mine? I'm now in a panic that they missed something even though it says it's negative.
venous obstruction was observed.
This negative result does not exclude isolated calf vein thrombus or non-obstructive proximal vein thrombus"
The last part is confusing. Why does it say it doesn't exclude calf vein thrombus or non-obstructive obstructive proximal vein thrombus? I thought the ultrasound was to exclude clots/thrombus throughout the whole leg. My whole leg was scanned.
Anyone else get a report like mine? I'm now in a panic that they missed something even though it says it's negative.