Diana wouldn't have been 'Queen' either, she would have been Queen Consort the same as Camilla.
Printable View
Diana wouldn't have been 'Queen' either, she would have been Queen Consort the same as Camilla.
Camilla wasn't supposed to have this title, remember. The public were overwhelmingly against it. The Queen was against it - and for almost the entirety of the 15 years that the tampon twins have been married. (Let's not even bother with all those years before this when the Queen couldn't stand the sight of the woman).
Except that a few months before his mother croaked, Charles (aka King Rat) used 'Mummy', with her failing health and bailing out of his brother, the Prince Nonce - as leverage to get her to 'give her blessing' for Camilla to be known as Queen Consort. (Cus he's a massive rat)
You're almost as vile about Charles and Camilla as Clarkson was about Megan, which puts you on the same depraved level as him really.
Good one Pain :roflmao:
You're honestly comparing my comments about those two to what Clarkson said about Meghan? (Comments which have resulted in record-breaking complaints?)
In that case, quote me.
Kindly, show me where my comments about Camilla have EVER been COMPARABLE to wanting to see her "paraded naked through the streets while people throw shit at her".
I make no bones about the fact that I dislike the pair of them, and I definitely take the piss at every opportunity. It's not all negative though. Perhaps you've missed the times I've sympathised with Camilla having to put up with Charles' tantrums? Or that I felt sorry for her? Or that I consider her attractive? But, I'll hold my hand up to 95% of my comments re those two to be of a certain nature. But there's a line, and if I've ever crossed that line, especially if it is COMPARABLE to Clarkson's comments re Meghan, then show me. (And everybody else).
Almost every comment I've made about Charles and Camilla is on this thread or 'The Queen', so feel free to trawl through my responses and quote any which you feel are comparable to what Clarkson said about Meghan. (A vicious, abhorrent comment which has resulted in record-breaking complaints).
I've understood for a long time that I'm not your cup of tea, Spectrum, but you must know by now that I will come back at you. There's no way that I'll leave a comment like that hanging there unaddressed, so I'm afraid you're going to have to do some homework in order to publicly out me as the "depraved" @rsehole you say I am.
Whatever you think I am, I know that I am an honest person, so, if as you say, I have said vicious and abhorrent things about Charles and Camilla, then I'll own the behaviour.. I'll be beyond mortified, truth be told, especially given my personal history, but I certainly won't try to defend, or justify, what's written in black and white. I will apologise for any offence caused and I will crawl away from this forum to rethink my existence because a comparison to a B'STARD like Clarkson ISN'T what I've been aiming for.
Over to you.
I shouldn't be too hard on yourself Nora.
On faceless online forums it can be dead easy for others to take certain comments/remarks the wrong way, even if the poster didn't actually intend to cause offence.
Every now and then I've been known to get it in the neck from others on here over certain things I've posted (not naming any names) and unwittingly caused offence/objection to them.
I think we can all be a bit 'woke' on occasions though, both online and offline.
P.S, Before I get shot down in flames myself, I'm not specifically calling anyone on here 'woke'.
Not the kind of bang he was hoping for? https://yoursmiles.org/tsmile/toilet/t9717.gif
Apparently when the doctor rang the bomb squad they replied they would "look into it" :whistles:
Lenco, I get that you're trying to diffuse this situation, and I thank you for trying. However, Spectrum suggesting that I am NMP's answer to Jeremy Clarkson at his very lowest level of scumbaggery (As in, his now deleted comments in The Sun) was, in my opinion, absolutely said to offend me.
What do you mean? I'm not really up to date with all this 'woke' business. Do you mean that I am being over-sensitive?Quote:
I think we can all be a bit 'woke' on occasions, both online and offline.
'Depraved' packs a powerful punch. It paints a certain picture. Its not a word that should be bandied about lightly, especially in public, so you bet your Christmas crackers that I'm taking this seriously!
Dictionary definition of 'depraved' is 'morally corrupt, wicked, perverted. Clarkson's comments absolutely tick all those boxes, and more besides, but that's not what I aim for on here. Also, My Batty has a lot of names for me, but those have yet to come up. If I have ever taken leave of my senses and said anything comparable to Clarkson then I want to see it in black and white, and with my name attached to it. Spectrum can screen shot or quote me, I'm not fussed, but it must be comparable to what Clarkson wrote about Meghan Markle in The Sun.
What? :huh:
1. There is an ignore option.Quote:
After reading the bile you spew regarding Charles and Camilla, you discust me and are not worthy any further reply.
2. The problem in you opting for the, 'You're not worthy of further reply' will be taken by some (including me) that you can't actually find any proof to back up your claim.
Thing is, we do have the choice whether or not read someone's content, and if we don't like what we see we can put them on ignore, but you chose not to do so in my case. Why is that?
I am highly critical of our King and his side-piece, but if you think that what I write about them is on the same level as what Clarkson wrote about Meghan, then I'm not sure you actually understand the meaning of the word, 'depraved'.
You chose to make a serious claim about me, Spectrum. This claim of yours could easily have been proved by looking through two threads. I even told you what the other one was called. What you've chosen - dictated by your own morals - is to insult me some more and fail to provide any proof to back up your claim that my comments about Charles and Camilla are (or have ever been) on the 'same depraved level' as Clarkson's hate speech about Meghan Markle.
"You disgust me and are not worthy any further reply" is a cop out, Spectrum. (It's also what people tend to say when they've backed themselves into a corner).
By the way...
The above was you talking to a NMP member..
What puts you on a higher moral ground to me (or anyone else on here) when this is how you talk to (and about) people?