Quote Originally Posted by Pain View Post
The Naked Fact....

Pornography, whichever way you dress it up, is the representation of sexual behaviour in books, pictures, films etcetera, specifically intended to cause sexual excitement and arousal. So, no matter if it’s a suggestively nude person or an “... AI powered tool[!]...”, it’s pornography.

“Can AI porn be ethical?”

https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...ethics-ai-porn

As all pornography can be considered [s]exploitative to some extent, maybe that question should be: can any porn be ethical?... Now, maybe some folks will only need to look at pornography for a moment or two to come to a quick conclusion, whereas others perhaps couldn’t give a toss one way or the other....


PS: At posh-ish school, woe betide anyone caught ‘lobbing’ – shorthand for “engaging in lewd and obscene behaviour unbefitting a young gentleman” – which encompassed all malarkey from looking at dirty books to more serious comings and goings. Nowadays, there’s probably a compulsory instruction manual with pictures.
It's just not realistic unless your AI GF tries to change you, experiences some headache nights, etc

It's a strange debate to have now when cartoon porn has been around for ages. But deep fake seems a bit different, it's like asking a sex toy company to mold a person's bits for you.

If you've seen the AI GF apps there is another worrying element in that they seem to follow the Japanese fascination with young girls and uniforms. Since the hentai porn debate is a big grey area this will only remind lawmakers they need to pull their finger out and make a decision.