What you eat affects your DNA.
None of us here knows nearly enough to form a legitimate opinion on whether this vaccine is a good or bad thing. Even with lots of self research.
What you eat affects your DNA.
None of us here knows nearly enough to form a legitimate opinion on whether this vaccine is a good or bad thing. Even with lots of self research.
The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away.
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” - Richard Feynman
☪️️
And there might be reasons that in this case and this scenario it is a good idea.
You (and nobody else here) is remotely qualified to form a viable opinion about it. Doesn't matter how much online research you've done.
Imagine the scenario 70 years ago when some dude came along and said 'so your cancer, what we're gonna do is inject you with radiation.....'
Thank you, I agree! I will eat healthy 90% of the time and continue to do daily workouts.
Wow. I don't mean to offend anybody here but the talk of condoning an RNA vaccine is absolutely stupid.
And Joe, I find your comments rather ignorant. I thought you were more logical than that pal.
Non of what I said is conspiracy, yet you speak as though RNA vaccines are just that.
Last edited by WiredIncorrectly; 23-09-20 at 21:10.__________________
The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away.
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” - Richard Feynman
☪️️
1) Nobody was offended.
2) Did anybody mention conspiracy?
3) I'm merely pointing out that you are claiming that this medicine is a terrible idea based on....your internet research? I'm not putting you down J, but you (and nobody else here) knows what they're talking about in terms of RNA/DNA vaccine trials. It's not about logic, it's just about being informed.
I think sometimes when somebody has more than two brain cells to rub together (you, for example), it's easy to get into the habit of reading and understanding a lot of information. What's also easy to miss is that you only learn the information you've come across, where the actual topic you're studying is massively more complex than the snapshots you've absorbed. That's not belittling what you know, it's just highlighting what you possibly don't know. It would take you 7-10 years to actually become an expert in this, so do you really feel you're in a position to declare this a bad idea based on a bit of web searching? I think you know what I'm trying to say here.
I totally agree with you.
I'm not specifically referring to anyone on here but there are sadly a lot of know-it-alls amongst the general public who seem to revel in misinfo and also politicising every aspect of this pandemic, which is actually hindering the progress in trying to address it.
And you're correct, Gary, in the sense that we can't just keep avoiding every new advancement in the medical field just in case something went wrong on just one or two persons, and of course to appease the serial antivaxxers and CTers, there would be barely any progress at all.
After all, every medical solution throughout history has started off as 'trial-and-error'.
Online research also tends to lead you to gravitate towards the evidence you want to believe in, intentional or not.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)