That's because of the "loser" states. (At least that's why my students have nicknamed them). States where governors are more concerned about economic decline and their loyalty to Trump than lives. In Florida they're still going to make everyone go back to school even though they're the new epicenter. Are they assuming there will be no economic decline if everyone get sick?
I'm still a work in progress.
Currently working on: World Domination
It’s Halloween eve on Shelter Island, and the small town is preparing for a killer storm. But the dark clouds gathering over the island are bringing with them a curse one-hundred years in waiting. As the woods give birth to an ungodly and insatiable creature of fire, bones, and earth, three sisters must scramble to stay alive through the long dark night of the Hollow. For it’s not something you can kill. It’s only something you can try and survive
FMD
Oh no, Johnson's said something I agree with! I've looked outside and the world is still the right way up...
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a9635781.html
Mind, you'd say the same thing if you caught it.
Some more impressive work going on here:
SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Has a “Camouflage” That Causes Cells Not to Recognize It – “Fundamental Advance in Our Understanding of the Virus”
https://scitechdaily.com/sars-cov-2-...the-virus/amp/
I'm still a work in progress.
Currently working on: World Domination
With regards your last paragraph, I think you might be correct. Despite very slight upturns in our cases over the past 2-3 weeks, though I don't wish to tempt fate by saying this, they have luckily managed to remain below 1k for almost a month now, and have generally been fluctuating between the end of June and now.
It will be interesting to see how things pan out over the coming weeks now face masks are now mandatory in shops and the like here in England.
Also, Scotland, Wales and NI appear to have had very low rates of CV deaths over the past couple of weeks, and it has already been speculated over the past week or so that England's deaths might have been overcounted, and are looking into only counting deaths that have occurred after a maximum period of 28 days (or less) after testing positive for the virus, which the other 3 UK territories have already been doing from the off, but the govt are already getting it in the neck as usual and being accused of using it to play down the CV death stats in England, whilst S, W and NI (who have generally been thought to have handled the situation far better than England) have, like I've already said above, standardised on the 28 day arrangement from the get-go. And this proposed arrangement is allegedly an attempt to more accurately gauge the situation in case of a relapse later in the year.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)